HostShare:香港VPS Xen架构 26.88元/月 2核1IP 2G内存 20G硬盘 无限流量 1Mbps 限量打折促销 附详细测评报告
简介:
VPS最新消息,许多网友对香港VPS情有独钟,今天就给大家分享一个性价比很高的香港VPS,这家主机服务商叫做hostshare。hostshare是一家主机分享组织,不以盈利为目的以众筹为主,长期低调运营一些廉价VPS商家,特别适合新手、个人学习等应用;主要采用xenserver为基础虚拟架构,硬盘为全ssd系列,数据中心包括香港和美国,本次香港月付及年付,均有大幅度优惠。
优惠码: Jun96 ( 全场终生96折优惠,限量20个 ) ,预购从速了,晚了没有。以下方案,每人最多购买3个,支持个人SS私用,不支持V7N服务。
官网:
HostShare官网: 立即前往
优惠码:
优惠码: Jun96 ( 全场终生96折优惠,限量20个 ) ,预购从速了,晚了没有。以下方案,每人最多购买3个,支持个人SS私用,不支持V7N服务。
优惠套餐
香港XENVPS优惠方案
|
|
|
美国洛杉矶节点优惠方案
256MB Special
|
付款方式:支付宝。
测试IP
HK -SSD : 45.125.13.1
USA-SSD : 198.52.120.1
需要的赶紧上吧,名额有限。
VPS详细测评报告
===系统基本信息===
CPU:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
cores:2
freq:2400.076
ram:1997
swap:991
uptime:0days, 0:43:33
OS:CentOS 6.9
Arch:x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel:2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64
ip:103.242.XXX.XXX
ipaddr: hostshare.cn
host:
uptime:0days, 0:43:33
vm:
he:
===开始测试带宽===
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from Hanshan District (103.242.XXX.XXX)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by Shanghai Branch, China Unicom (Shanghai) [19.64 km]: 40.67 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 48.43 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 0.97 Mbit/s
Share results: http://www.speedtest.net/result/6354658906.png
===带宽测试结束==
===开始测试下载速度和IO性能===
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 204.93.150.152 5.76MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 2.51MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 6.24MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 3.15MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 61.9KB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.57MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 2.17MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 4.64MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 3.02MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 3.51MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 6.58MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 452 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 449 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 393 MB/s
Average I/O: 431.333 MB/s
===测试回程路由===
HOST: MyCloudServer Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 103.242.135.254 90.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0
2. 10.85.212.149 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0
3. 10.1.1.254 0.0% 10 1.5 2.0 1.0 3.2 0.7
4. 10.1.0.238 0.0% 10 5.4 2.3 1.6 5.4 1.2
5. 210.48.136.161 0.0% 10 2.5 3.8 1.9 9.6 2.7
6. 59.43.249.9 0.0% 10 1.5 8.4 1.5 60.5 18.3
7. 59.43.183.109 0.0% 10 7.7 14.4 7.2 72.9 20.6
8. 59.43.246.129 40.0% 10 9.3 9.8 7.7 12.9 2.0
9. 59.43.247.101 0.0% 10 7.8 7.8 7.0 10.0 0.9
10. 59.43.80.22 0.0% 10 9.1 10.3 8.6 12.7 1.3
11. 113.96.0.89 10.0% 10 12.3 13.5 9.4 16.9 2.2
12. 113.108.209.106 0.0% 10 8.3 9.8 8.2 20.2 3.7
13. 121.14.18.90 0.0% 10 9.0 9.6 8.7 11.3 1.0
14. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
15. 58.63.244.254 0.0% 10 9.4 13.1 8.2 29.9 7.7
=== 路由测试结束===
===进行PING测试===
{start testing Linode?ユ. ping}
PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=202 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=61.3 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=61.1 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=60.9 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=60.6 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=60.6 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=61.0 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=61.7 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=61.2 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=10 ttl=54 time=61.1 ms
--- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9074ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.662/75.199/202.088/42.297 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Vultr?ユ. ping}
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=56.6 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=56.4 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=56.4 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=56.3 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=56.2 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=57.1 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=57.1 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=56.6 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=56.3 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=56.1 ms
--- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9069ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 56.195/56.551/57.154/0.436 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Budgetvm娲..??ping}
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=155 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=154 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=153 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=154 ms
--- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9166ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 153.997/154.601/156.583/0.819 ms
{end testing}
{start testing kdatacenter?╁.SK ping}
PING downloadtest.kdatacenter.com (211.33.122.250) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=255 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=254 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=253 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=249 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=252 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=261 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=268 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=8 ttl=49 time=266 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=9 ttl=49 time=267 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=10 ttl=49 time=270 ms
--- downloadtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9282ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 249.431/259.939/270.302/7.251 ms
{end testing}
{start testing ?..?╁.KT ping}
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=63.1 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=62.9 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=62.4 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=63.7 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=62.3 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=241 time=62.7 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=241 time=63.1 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=241 time=64.0 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=241 time=63.2 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=241 time=62.4 ms
--- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9076ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 62.373/63.018/64.068/0.626 ms
本文由 vps网友提供 刊发,转载请注明出处