Cloudiplc:洛杉矶QN KVM 1核1IP 15.4元/月 384M 10GB 18.30元/月 512M 20G HDD1T 1Gbps 洛杉矶QN亚太优化 中国电信及联通直连链路 附带详细测评报告
简介:
VPS最新消息,国人主机服务商cloudiplc是一家成立不久的新商家,但口碑非常不错;采用KVM为基础虚拟架构,本次优惠主打洛杉矶QN机房亚洲优化线路年付方案,以及泉州CN2优质线路VPS;前者性价比好一些,带宽为1Gbps上行,建站或正常网络应用均属优秀行列,后者属于高端大气型专属客户应用。本次推出了VOZ和KVM两个架构的VPS促销计划。本次推出61儿童节活动,给各位大孩子们特别的礼物:限量 16 台的 QN 机房 VPS 6.1 折优惠,最低配 29.99×6.1=18.2939 元!优惠码【 61666 】,这个是本次促销的一个亮点。
官网:
Cloudiplc官网: 立即前往
优惠码:
长期优惠码:91yun-QN
61促销优惠码: 61666 (优惠码可用十六次)
便宜特价套餐
USA-lax KVM 384M
|
61儿童节优惠套餐
USA-lax KVM 512M
|
USA-lax KVM 1G
|
付款方式:支付宝。
VPS测试报告
===系统基本信息===
CPU:QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
cores:1
freq:2400.084
ram:488
swap:256
uptime:1days, 5:55:0
OS:CentOS 6.8
Arch:x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel:4.9.0-1.el6.x86_64
ip:107.150.XXX.XXX
ipaddr:美国 加利福尼亚州 洛杉矶 quadranet.com
host:
uptime:1days, 5:55:0
vm:
he:
===开始测试带宽===
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from QuadraNet (107.150.XXX.XXX)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by Atlantic Metro (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 7.908 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 358.25 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 242.03 Mbit/s
Share results: http://www.speedtest.net/result/6345326058.png
===带宽测试结束==
===开始测试下载速度和IO性能===
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 77.5MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 7.88MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.04MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 3.50MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 3.16MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.26MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 12.2MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 13.4MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 3.12MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 3.76MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 4.79MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 209 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 199 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 192 MB/s
Average I/O: 200 MB/s
===测试 [广州电信(超级信息港)] 的回程路由===
HOST: vps.cloudiplc.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 107.150.8.1.cloudiplc.com 0.0% 10 1.6 9.7 0.5 87.2 27.2
2. colo-lax9.as8100.net 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1
3. 218.30.44.117 0.0% 10 1.0 1.2 0.9 2.2 0.4
4. 203.14.186.193 0.0% 10 2.2 3.3 1.6 7.5 2.2
5. 202.97.50.25 0.0% 10 2.6 2.8 1.8 6.0 1.2
6. 202.97.51.109 30.0% 10 151.1 155.8 151.1 183.4 12.2
7. 202.97.34.77 0.0% 10 160.8 159.8 158.0 162.0 1.3
8. 202.97.34.113 0.0% 10 150.8 149.3 147.4 150.8 1.1
9. 113.96.0.89 0.0% 10 155.1 152.9 147.6 156.9 2.8
10. 113.108.209.114 0.0% 10 149.2 148.5 145.7 158.0 3.5
11. 121.14.18.94 0.0% 10 155.8 157.6 154.7 171.5 5.0
12. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. 58.63.244.254 20.0% 10 151.3 150.1 147.5 158.5 3.7
===回程 [广州电信(超级信息港)] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [上海电信] 的回程路由===
HOST: vps.cloudiplc.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 107.150.8.1.cloudiplc.com 0.0% 10 0.7 3.1 0.5 22.9 7.0
2. colo-lax9.as8100.net 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1
3. 69.12.69.1 0.0% 10 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.5 0.3
4. 218.30.44.117 0.0% 10 0.9 1.8 0.9 4.4 1.2
5. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
===回程 [上海电信] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [重庆联通] 的回程路由===
HOST: vps.cloudiplc.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 107.150.8.1.cloudiplc.com 0.0% 10 1.0 6.6 0.8 42.4 13.3
2. colo-lax9.as8100.net 0.0% 10 1.3 1.2 0.4 4.7 1.3
3. china.unicom 0.0% 10 0.7 1.5 0.7 5.0 1.4
4. 199.102.95.6 0.0% 10 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.1
5. 219.158.104.17 0.0% 10 161.5 161.4 158.9 167.8 2.7
6. 219.158.97.177 0.0% 10 158.9 161.0 158.1 164.7 2.2
7. 219.158.4.125 0.0% 10 163.6 164.9 159.5 180.9 6.2
8. 219.158.12.70 0.0% 10 187.8 197.4 187.8 222.8 10.9
9. 113.207.25.166 0.0% 10 183.6 185.7 183.2 199.3 4.9
10. 58.144.255.30 10.0% 10 193.2 319.9 193.2 1285. 362.2
11. 113.207.32.65 10.0% 10 205.7 198.3 192.1 211.5 6.9
===回程 [重庆联通] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [天津移动] 的回程路由===
HOST: vps.cloudiplc.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 107.150.8.1.cloudiplc.com 0.0% 10 80.8 8.9 0.5 80.8 25.3
2. colo-lax9.as8100.net 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.1
3. 63-218-212-169.static.pccwgl 0.0% 10 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.5 0.2
4. las-b3-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.1 0.2
5. las-b21-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.6 0.1
6. chinamobile-ic-319994-las-b2 0.0% 10 1.1 1.3 1.1 2.4 0.4
7. 223.118.10.153 0.0% 10 3.4 3.1 1.1 4.6 1.1
8. 221.183.30.245 90.0% 10 188.3 188.3 188.3 188.3 0.0
9. 221.183.46.250 70.0% 10 184.1 211.7 184.1 266.7 47.6
10. 221.176.21.145 90.0% 10 181.0 181.0 181.0 181.0 0.0
11. 221.176.16.173 40.0% 10 170.7 170.5 169.9 171.1 0.5
12. 221.183.13.42 50.0% 10 176.3 175.1 174.8 176.3 0.7
13. 211.103.87.9 10.0% 10 182.5 182.6 182.5 182.8 0.1
===回程 [天津移动] 路由测试结束===
===开始进行全国PING测试===
===进行全国PING测试结束===
{start testing Linode日本 ping}
PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=103 ms
--- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9115ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.633/103.703/103.795/0.152 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Vultr日本 ping}
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=10 ttl=54 time=105 ms
--- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9119ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 105.109/105.214/105.351/0.334 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Budgetvm洛杉矶 ping}
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.09 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=1.21 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=1.03 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=1.14 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=1.19 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=1.25 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=7 ttl=60 time=1.29 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=1.65 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=1.16 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=1.20 ms
--- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9017ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.031/1.224/1.652/0.162 ms
{end testing}
{start testing kdatacenter韩国SK ping}
PING downloadtest.kdatacenter.com (211.33.122.250) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=148 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=148 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=148 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=147 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=148 ms
--- downloadtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9161ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 147.732/147.934/148.167/0.215 ms
{end testing}
{start testing 星光韩国KT ping}
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=241 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=241 time=132 ms
--- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9148ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 132.364/132.519/132.867/0.284 ms
本文由 vps网友提供 刊发,转载请注明出处